lenihan (1)

Case Study Details

We always bring client satisfaction no matter what the case
International Investment Law

International Investment Law

Case Details

Client: Jack Travol
Attorney: James Lenihan
Case Start: 24 / 04 / 2021
Execution Time: 5 Months
Result: Winner
Other: Your Custom


Download our document to see specific data of the service and how we work.


Years Of Experience

Many Prestigious Awards

Experienced Attorney

Free Consulting

Let's win together

Please feel free to contact us. We will get back to you with 1-2 business days. Or just call us now.

Summary Of The Case Studies

In this case study, we delve into a complex international investment dispute that highlights the intricacies of international investment law. The case involves a multinational corporation, Acme Global Investments, and a host country, Republica, where Acme had made significant investments in a mining project. The dispute arises from a series of government actions by Republica, including regulatory changes and tax policies, which adversely affected Acme’s investment and profitability.

The Problems Being Encountered of the Case

  1. Regulatory Changes: Republica introduced sweeping changes to its mining regulations, making it more challenging for Acme to operate profitably. These changes included stricter environmental standards and increased royalties.
  2. Tax Policies: Republica implemented new tax policies that significantly increased the tax burden on Acme’s mining operations, eroding their expected return on investment.
  3. Political Instability: The host country experienced political instability, leading to uncertainty in the legal and regulatory environment. This instability further complicated Acme’s operations.

Our Approach And Solution

To address the complex challenges faced in this international investment dispute, the law firm adopted the following strategic approach:

  • Legal Analysis: The legal team conducted a comprehensive analysis of the host country’s regulatory changes and tax policies to identify potential violations of international investment treaties.
  • Treaty Protection: The law firm invoked the protections provided under bilateral investment treaties and multilateral agreements that Republica had ratified. These treaties safeguarded Acme’s rights as a foreign investor.
  • Negotiation: The law firm engaged in negotiations with Republica’s government representatives to find an amicable solution. This involved advocating for regulatory reforms and tax incentives to restore the project’s profitability.
  • Arbitration: As negotiations failed to yield a satisfactory resolution, the law firm initiated arbitration proceedings under the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The arbitration tribunal was selected through a neutral process.

Attorney In This Case:

James Lenihan

Owner, Lenihan & Associates, LLC

Why choose This law firm: A boutique firm specializing in litigation. Whether your issues are in State or Federal Court or whether they are either civil or criminal matters, this firm gives you the individual attention you want and deserve. We don’t handle cases . . .we represent people!

The Outcome of the Lawsuit

The case reached a favorable resolution for Acme Global Investments. The arbitration tribunal ruled in favor of Acme, finding that Republica’s actions had violated the bilateral investment treaty between the two countries. The tribunal ordered Republica to:

  1. Roll back the regulatory changes that unfairly burdened Acme’s mining operations.
  2. Provide fair compensation for the financial losses suffered by Acme due to the regulatory changes and tax policies.

This case study demonstrates the effectiveness of international investment law in protecting the rights and interests of foreign investors. It serves as an example of a successful resolution through arbitration, emphasizing the importance of legal expertise in navigating complex international investment disputes.

Case Image

Customer Reviews in this Case